Received: from e55.webcom.com (e55.webcom.com [206.2.192.66]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.5/8.7.5-MZ) with ESMTP id RAA01014 for <DWARNER@ALBANY.NET>; Wed, 17 Apr 1996 17:43:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost by e55.webcom.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA173597162; Wed, 17 Apr 1996 14:39:22 -0700
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 1996 14:39:22 -0700
Message-Id: <31750756.1BE9@chedd-angier.com>
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: Sean Moyer <seanmyr@chedd-angier.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: spline control limits
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
>> however, I'd like to see more extreme values [of spline
>> controls] possible than currently.
>I think these limits come from the equations used to create the spline
>curves. For examle, a tention of 0 may indicate a 0 value in the variable
>spot in the equtation, -1 may indicate negative infinity, and 1 may indicate
>positive infinity. So what number is larger than positive infinity?